Great idea!

I always thought Perl in general was quite suited for show casing and
learning with different styles and ways of solving problems. It's
flexibility is a key element in that. Especially in CS, students need to
learn that there is more then one way to do it and be able to compare
those different ways. Perl 6 in that line a great asset.

w

On 19/01/16 16:57, Tom Browder wrote:
> Last year I mentioned a letter-to-the-editor in Communications of the
> ACM which discussed the short-comings of Python as an introduction to
> programming for computer science students.  As a response to that
> letter, I suggested that the dissatisfied professor consider Perl 6 as
> it would meet his requirements.
> 
> My casual look at the programming scene over the last decade seems to
> show that Python is regularly chosen as the language for open source
> projects and as a teaching language.  The Perl community on
> <perlmonks.org>  seems adamant that there are few, if any, business
> reasons for Perl 5 shops to use Perl 6, so the academic community may
> be the best place to aim Perl 6 marketing for the growth of a Perl 6
> community among young people.
> 
> I have seen lots of blogs and on-line articles comparing the two
> languages, but I have not yet found one truly suitable for college and
> high school academic marketing and curriculum development.  The only
> article on Perl 6 I have found in the ACM archives was a 2007 article
> by Audrey Tang.  Its citation and access page is found here:
> 
>   http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1190216.1190218
> 
> Note the ACM reports that the article has been cited two times in
> other ACM articles, and has been downloaded a total of 524 times.
> 
> I also searched the IEEE archives for Perl 6 and found nothing.
> 
> Suggestion
> ========
> 
> I suggest that a good move would be to produce a good, and current,
> scholarly article, aiming to be published in a suitable professional
> journal, with a detailed, objective comparison between Python and Perl
> 6.  I'm sure there are properly-qualified people in the Perl 6
> community that could do a very credible job, and it should be worth
> support from the Perl Foundation.
> 
> Audrey Tang's article (based on information on the citation page only)
> doesn't seem to fit the specific comparison I think is needed, but the
> article may be useful background for any new author.
> 
> Of course there may already be such an article in academia, but
> apparently not in the computer science education realm.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> -Tom
> 


-- 
GPG Key: https://u2m.nl/data/webmind.asc
GPG Fingerprint:         0506976E 234653B4 A628EC33 E23D16EE FCF154AE
XMPP webm...@puscii.nl:  D79970A8 7EC43E29 186D86BA 590F20F6 4C7930B8
XMPP webm...@laglab.org: 11E91112 091881F7 53EF6108 63C48543 C74D035C
u2m.nl (exp: 08/04/2016) SHA256:
C2:40:67:22:25:52:29:AF:DF:50:4E:2A:6B:32:6D:BC:5B:1E:CA:7D:52:3B:4C:4A:21:5D:C8:E5:AE:7D:1A:09
Puscii (exp: 04/03/2016) SHA256:
F9:C7:B1:B7:90:6B:17:BF:84:93:93:7C:0F:B4:FD:BE:E3:C0:71:9D:83:01:ED:3A:96:FE:FC:82:9D:30:51:C9

Reply via email to