On Sun Feb 28 21:47:37 2016, r...@hoelz.ro wrote: > I would expect a "last without loop construct" error instead.
It's a read-eval-print-*loop*, so it turns out you actually are in a loop construct and end up exiting that! :-) We can likely get the behavior you're after though, which I think makes sense, by adding a CONTROL block in the REPL loop, and delegating to the HLL's handler.
