On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:14:07AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:57:36AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote: > : So, between the two consistencies, do you think that the more DWIMmy > : one of parsing "0o123" is more helpful? I'll implement it tomorrow > : if that's the case. :) > > Yes, I do. That was one of the main reasons for switching to the > less ambiguous 0o123 notation.
Implemented in r948. Can you take a look at
http://svn.openfoundry.org/pugs/t/builtins/numify.t
and see if it makes sense? More tests are welcome too.
Thanks,
/Autrijus/
pgprtuXBp8uUH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
