Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> Looking at t/operators/ternary.t...
>
> At the bottom of the file, there is a test that reads:
>
> {
> # This parses incorrectly because it's parsed as Bool::True(!!
> Bool::False).
> my $foo = eval q[ 1 ?? Bool::True !! Bool::False ];
> is($foo, Bool::True, "a statement with both ??!! and :: in it did
> compile"), :todo<bug>;
> }
>
>
> I'm not entirely certain what this test is intending to test.To me it tests for a pugs specific parse bug. > Do we need it? I'm sure nobody invented it just for fun, so we probably need it. > Does it perhaps belong somewhere else? I don't know. Somehow it's good to have parse tests in the test file of the corresponding feature, but I'm not sure if there is a better solution here... -- Moritz Lenz http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
