Larry (>): > I don't see a bug here. First, there's no prohibition on multiple > similar metas anymore. But with regard to the example above, metas > are parsed as their own tokens, and the infix:<RR> is longer than > the meta R, so should take precedence under LTM. We used to try > to form tokens out of all possible forms of meta, but that resulted > in an explosion, even with restrictions on meta recursion. So we > lifted the restriction and now parse metas separately, albeit > still with the requirement of no whitespace between meta and base op. > > Anyway, if there is a tie between a meta and a normal, it tries > the meta first and then backtracks to the normal if the meta > doesn't find a base op. That's how Xop wins against X.
I had an inkling this might actually be a non-bug. Rejecting ticket.
