On Mon Apr 05 14:21:29 2010, coke wrote:
> On Sun Jan 11 00:21:58 2009, pmichaud wrote:
> > On Mon Nov 24 09:12:36 2008, masak wrote:
> > > <masak> rakudo: for 1..5 -> $a, $b { say $a, $b }
> > > <p6eval> rakudo 33137: OUTPUT[1234StopIterationcurrent instr.:
> > > '_block11' pc 78 (EVAL_15:29)]
> > >
> > > I haven't searched the specs or the tests for what should happen,
> but
> > > I'm pretty sure this shouldn't throw an exception.
> >
> > Stalling this ticket until there's a description of what should happen
> > (either in S04 or S07) and tests to match.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Pm
> >
> >
>
> 17:17 < CokeBot9000> TimToady:
> http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60780
> - I
> would imagine that on the last loop through, a
> would get
> 5, and b would get whatever undef is these days.
> 17:18 <@TimToady> no, it just fails to bind, unless you declare the
> second
> parameter as optional
> 17:19 < CokeBot9000> (fails to bind) - just on the last iteration, yes?
> 17:20 <@TimToady> yes, just the last iteration
>
23:56 < [Coke]> rakudo: for 1..5 -> $a, $b { say $a, $b }
23:56 <+p6eval> rakudo cbdd9b: OUTPUT«1234Not enough positional parameters
passed;
got 1 but expected 2 in block <anon> at /tmp/DxYdxC7jfN:1
in
method reify at src/gen/CORE.setting:3690 in method reify at
src/gen/CORE.setting:3595 in method reify at
src/gen/CORE.setting:3595 in method gimme…
23:56 < [Coke]> rakudo: for 1..5 -> $a, $b? { say $a, $b }
23:56 <+p6eval> rakudo cbdd9b: OUTPUT«12345Mu()»
good enough for tests?
--
Will "Coke" Coleda