Am 11.01.2012 16:46, schrieb Will Coleda via RT:
On Tue Aug 17 21:54:31 2010, coke wrote:
On Sun Apr 25 07:22:56 2010, masak wrote:
<JimmyZ> masak: alpha is diferent from rakudo
<JimmyZ> masak: which one is right?
<JimmyZ> alpha: my $b =&time; say&$b();
<p6eval> alpha 30e0ed: OUTPUT«1272203938.46735»
<JimmyZ> rakudo: my $b =&time; say&$b();
<p6eval> rakudo e393c7: OUTPUT«»
<masak> rakudo: my $b =&time; say $b();
<p6eval> rakudo e393c7: OUTPUT«1272203984.27821»
<masak> JimmyZ: viv seems to indicate that alpha was right there.
<masak> i.e. that&$b() should be parsed as (&$b).()
* masak submits rakudobug
Error has changed:
00:53<[Coke]> rakudo: my $b =&time; say&$b();
00:53<p6eval> rakudo 67778a: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===Non-declarative
sigil is
missing its name at line 22, near "&$b();"»
And again:
10:45< [Coke]> rakudo: my $b =&time; say&$b();
10:46<+p6eval> rakudo 38165a: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===Symbol '&time' not
predeclared in<anonymous> (/tmp/rmvYisn_Ne:1)»
The problem here is just that 'time' is implemented as a term, not as a
subroutine in the setting. If I do the same thing with something that's
actually a subroutine, it works fine:
09:46 < moritz> nom: sub f { 6 }; my $b = &f; say &$b()
09:46 <+p6eval> nom 47540c: OUTPUT«6»
likewise if I reference 'time' correctly:
09:47 <+p6eval> nom 47540c: OUTPUT«1326441971»
09:47 < moritz> nom: my $b = &term:<time>; &$b()
Can be closed with tests.
Cheers,
Moritz
