On Tue Dec 21 01:10:35 2010, masak wrote:
> <masak> rakudo: class A { ... }; class B is A {}; class A {}
> <p6eval> rakudo cae7f9: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===Parent isn't a Class.»
> * masak submits LTA rakudobug
> * masak wonders idly what the parent is
> <masak> rakudo: class A { ... }; say A.WHAT
> <p6eval> rakudo cae7f9: OUTPUT«Failure()»
> <masak> ah.
> <masak> rakudo: class A { ... }; class B is A {}
> <p6eval> rakudo cae7f9: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===Null PMC access in
can()»
> <masak> huh.
> <masak> that's the first causality-defying Null PMC access. :)
This seems fine now:
09:18 < [Coke]> rakudo: class A { ... }; class B is A {}; class A {} #RT
#81060
09:18 <+p6eval> rakudo ce5cca: ( no output )
09:18 < [Coke]> rakudo: class A { ... }; say A.WHAT #RT 81060
09:18 <+p6eval> rakudo ce5cca: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===The following
packages were
stubbed but not defined: A»
Closable with tests.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda