# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #123800]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# <URL: https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=123800 >
<lizmat> $ ls -ls big*
<lizmat> 11724800 -rw------- 1 liz macports 6003097600 Feb 11 19:08 big
<lizmat> 11724800 -rw-r--r-- 1 liz macports 6003097600 Feb 11 19:11 big2
<masak> by the way, is it intentional (or by spec) that those two
files have different umasks?
<lizmat> I guess the copy used a different umask
<lizmat> $ umask
<lizmat> 0022
<lizmat> hmmm...
<Juerd> imho copy should force the permissions to be the same,
regardless of the umask
<Juerd> (When chmod is permitted at all)
<moritz> is that what GNU cp does?
<Juerd> moritz: Yes:
<Juerd> open("a", O_RDONLY) = 3
<Juerd> fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0400, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
<Juerd> open("b", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL, 0400) = 4
<Juerd> 0400 is the mode
<Juerd> And that changes if I delete b and chmod a and then do another
"strace cp a b"
<masak> ok, now I feel like submitting a rakudobug about © not
setting the umask to the same, like GNU cp does.
<lizmat> masak: please do, so it won't fall though the cracks
* masak does
<lizmat> I'm not sure at which level this should be fixed, though
<lizmat> feels to me, MoarVM should be doing the right thing on open
