Fixed with d31495f , closable with tests

> On 12 May 2016, at 18:15, Salvador Ortiz (via RT) 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> # New Ticket Created by  Salvador Ortiz 
> # Please include the string:  [perl #128138]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. 
> # <URL: https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128138 >
> 
> 
> <sortiz> m: enum Foo <a b>; Foo.enums.WHAT.say; # Why Hash and not Map?
> <camelia> rakudo-moar 1e5df4: OUTPUT«(Hash)␤»
> <gfldex> m: enum Foo <a b>; Foo.enums<c> = 2; dd Foo.enums;
> <camelia> rakudo-moar 1e5df4: OUTPUT«{:a(0), :b(1), :c(2)}␤»
> <gfldex> m: enum Foo <a b>; Foo.enums<c> = 2; dd Foo.enums; say Foo::a; say 
> Foo::c;
> <camelia> rakudo-moar 1e5df4: OUTPUT«{:a(0), :b(1), :c(2)}␤a␤Could not find 
> symbol '&c'␤  in block <unit> at /tmp/l6HF74YgT0 line 1␤␤Actually thrown at:␤ 
>  in block <unit> at /tmp/l6HF74YgT0 line 1␤␤»
> <gfldex> sortiz: because of a lack of rakudobug it seams
> <sortiz> jnthn, Do you agree that Map is a better option?
> <jnthn> sortiz: I'd say so...

Reply via email to