# New Ticket Created by Sam S.
# Please include the string: [perl #130572]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# <URL: https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130572 >
➜ say (for ^4 { .say }).WHAT;
0
1
2
3
(List)
➜ say (lazy for ^4 { .say }).WHAT;
0
1
2
3
(Seq)
I would have expected an output of just `(Seq)` in both cases, or at
least in the second case.
The synopses don't seem to make a statement on whether a `List` or
`Seq` should be returned, but S04 is quite clear that both should be
lazy <https://design.perl6.org/S04.html#line_688>:
lazy loops can be indicated by putting the loop in parens
or brackets:
(... if COND for LIST) # lazy list comprehension
[for LIST { ... }]
(loop { ... })
or by use of either a statement prefix or a phaser in
statement form:
lazy for LIST { ... }
ENTER for LIST { ... }
According to bisectable and committable
<https://gist.github.com/dd0b5601f4198d88bbfd8dc746d7eb25>, Rakudo has
always done it like it does now, though.
---
This is Rakudo version 2016.12-315-gdaf7e5185 built on MoarVM version
2016.12-113-gd1da1bac
implementing Perl 6.c.
