This wasn't updated in a while. As of today (2017.11,HEAD(e5b660e)), it still
complains about final ) like mentioned in one of the recent comments. And yes,
this tickets seems to be rejectable.

On 2015-07-20 09:27:25, duff wrote:
> I'm not sure this is a bug. The postfix for is a statement modifier,
> and it's being used in an argument list context. For it to parse
> right, you'd have to do something like this:
>
> all( do { my $c for () } );
>
> or even
>
> all( (my $c for ()) );
>
> I didn't test the version with the balanced sub, but I guess it would
> require something similar.
>
> -Scott
>
> On Wed Feb 15 06:37:15 2012, masak wrote:
> > <masak> nom: sub balanced { all((my $c += $_ eq "[" ?? 1 !! -1) < 0
> > for $^s.comb) && !$c }; .say when &balanced for (^(2 **
> > 6))».fmt("%06b")».trans("01" => "[]")
> > <p6eval> nom bd5adb: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤Redeclaration of symbol
> > $c␤at
> > /tmp/f7OZkWSnoP:1␤»
> > <masak> huh.
> > <masak> nom: all(my $c for ())
> > <p6eval> nom bd5adb: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤Redeclaration of symbol
> > $c␤at
> > /tmp/XLWPyMzIwp:1␤»
> > <masak> that's the shortest I can make it.
> > * masak submits rakudobug

Reply via email to