On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:02:31PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> I'm really thinking that the lexer, parser, and tokenizer can't be anywhere
> near as separate as we'd like. I think we're going to end up with a rather
> odd mutant beast. Hopefully one that's understandable by reasonably sane
> people...
This would *honestly* be my preference; I think it would be far easier to
write and understand than anything else. So long as it's nicely re-entrant we
should be fine. My only worry is, how do we reconcile this with the idea of
Perl having an easily modifiable grammar and being a good environment for
little-language stuff?
--
?warning: write might change good version of `/dev/null'
- plan9 has a bad day
- Re: Backtracking through the source Tom Hughes
- Re: Backtracking through the source Simon Cozens
- Re: Backtracking through the source Tom Hughes
- Re: Backtracking through the source Simon Cozens
- Re: Backtracking through the source Tom Hughes
- Re: Backtracking through the source Steve Fink
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Steve Fink
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Simon Cozens
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... David Grove
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Simon Cozens
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... David Grove
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Simon Cozens
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... David Grove
- Re: Backtracking through the sour... Simon Cozens
