On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 01:43:05PM +0100, Graham Barr wrote: > Let me just say that Larry has said in the past that untainting was > deliberatly left difficult to do, on the basis that something which > can have serious effect (ie security) should not be easy to do. > > But then I suppose all previous decisions are up for re-deciding Yes, they are. If we're going to make it trivially easy to untaint, should we bother having tainting at all? :( -- >Almost any animal is capable learning a stimulus/response association, >given enough repetition. Experimental observation suggests that this isn't true if double-clicking is involved. - Lionel, Malcolm Ray, asr.
- RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Matthew Cline
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $... John Tobey
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Matthew Cline
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $... Graham Barr