At 11:01 -0600 2000-08-01, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>Dominic Dunlop writes:
>>  Pluggable regex engines would make supporting (say) core and optional
>>  regex language features easier.
>
>(Nat qua Nat speaking)
>
>The word "pluggable" gives me the willies.  I feel like things like
>REs should have one blessed implementation and set of capabilities.

...

>If nobody else will, I will RFC this architecture concept: unity.

Fair enough.  Some of the language folks may see this as 
party-pooping, but fair enough.  The rest of what I said about the 
regex language still stands, though.
-- 
Dominic Dunlop

Reply via email to