On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 06:10:53PM -0400, John Tobey wrote: > Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > By all means have a go at Topaz-II > > > > But it won't be 'Perl 6' unless it implements what perl-language > > decides that _is_. > > Agreed. It won't even remotely resemble 'Perl 6' (as opposed to Perl > 5) until it's in a position to start changing the lexer, at least > several months from now. So please, follow Chips wise lead, don't call your work Perl 6. Tim.
- Re: inline mania Sam Tregar
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Sam Tregar
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Sam Tregar
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Alan Burlison
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Tim Bunce
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania Tim Bunce
- Re: inline mania Andy Wardley
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania Tim Bunce
- Re: inline mania Graham Barr
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski