On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 06:10:53PM -0400, John Tobey wrote:
> Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > By all means have a go at Topaz-II 
> > 
> > But it won't be 'Perl 6' unless it implements what perl-language 
> > decides that _is_.
> 
> Agreed.  It won't even remotely resemble 'Perl 6' (as opposed to Perl
> 5) until it's in a position to start changing the lexer, at least
> several months from now.

So please, follow Chips wise lead, don't call your work Perl 6.

Tim.

Reply via email to