At 02:18 PM 8/2/00 +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: >Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > From a language perspective, I have a scheme to allow us to yank all the > > cruft (sockets, shm, messages, localtime...) out into separate libraries, > > yet pull them in on demand without needing a use. > >a la dbmopen in perl5? A step beyond that. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: C# (.NET) has no interpreters John Tobey
- Re: C# (.NET) has no interpreters Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date interfa... Dan Sugalski
- Re: interpreter performance Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date in... Randy J. Ray
- opcodes (was Re: Stuff in core (wa... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date in... Ken Fox
- Papers and reference works Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date in... Larry Wall
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date interface, on language (... Piers Cawley
- Dan Sugalski