On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 12:03:36PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > I've been thinking we could have a "state change" op that would selectively > and lexically alter the appropriate state variable (warnings, stricture, > shell, taint checking, whatever) on the fly. Each op would check the > current state if the situation warranted, rather than sprinkling "check > this assumption" ops througout the code. This could solve the problem of running out of bits in the OPs to add a new flag etc. and make it much more easy to add new pragmas Graham.
- pramgas as compile-time-only Chaim Frenkel
- Re: pramgas as compile-time-only Dan Sugalski
- Re: pramgas as compile-time-only Graham Barr
- Re: pramgas as compile-time-only Dan Sugalski
- Re: pramgas as compile-time-only Larry Wall
- Re: pramgas as compile-time-only Chaim Frenkel
- Re: pramgas as compile-time-onl... Dan Sugalski
- Re: pramgas as compile-time-only Chaim Frenkel
- Re: pramgas as compile-time-only Graham Barr
- Re: pramgas as compile-time-only Dan Sugalski
- Re: pramgas as compile-time-only Uri Guttman
- Re: pramgas as compile-time-only Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: pramgas as compile-time-onl... Dan Sugalski