Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: > >> Perl6 Rfc Librarian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >This document is not precisely concerned with the details of the >> >implementation >> >of the interfaces it specifies, beyond a general attempt to restric >> >itself to the possible. >> >> But this list is _only_ concerned with implementation details. > >Well, assuming you consider API definitions implementation details. :) Of course ! C/C++/LISP/XS API yes - what it looks like in Perl no. -- Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Via, but not speaking for: Texas Instruments Ltd.
- RFC 61 (v2) Interfaces for linking C objects into pe Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 61 (v2) Interfaces for linking C objects ... Hildo Biersma
- Re: RFC 61 (v2) Interfaces for linking C obje... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 61 (v2) Interfaces for linking C objects ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 61 (v2) Interfaces for linking C obje... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 61 (v2) Interfaces for linking C ... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 61 (v2) Interfaces for linking C objects ... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 61 (v2) Interfaces for linking C obje... Dan Sugalski
- are API definitions implementation detail... Nick Ing-Simmons
- are API definitions implementation detail... David L. Nicol
- Re: are API definitions implementatio... Dan Sugalski
- Re: are API definitions implementatio... Nick Ing-Simmons