Re: RFC 136 (v1) Implementation of hash iterators

[Tom Hughes]

In message <20000823054734$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> what happens if you modify the hash when you have an iterator? also we
> have to require the iteration order to be fixed for a given hash which
> is not modified so slices and such will remain synchronized.

Explaining how to deal with that was the main thrust of RFC136.

Tom

-- 
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
...ERROR #1511: Brain Offline