At 07:38 PM 9/28/00 +0000, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
>These APIs should be documented separately from the implementation, in a
>language-independent and an object-oriented way.
Unfortunately the two conflict. C, APL, Fortran, and COBOL aren't
particularly object-oriented... Not that I disagree with the idea of a
solid, documented, *designed* API, nor that the perl bits should be
considered magic cookies that should not be twiddled with--I rather like
both. I think, though, that the core interface should be procedural.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Should Have W... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Shou... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl C... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Pe... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components ... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Pe... John Porter
- RE: RFC 125 (v2) Components in t... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components ... 'John Porter'
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Compone... Bart Schuller
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Compone... Tim Bunce
