Simon Cozens wrote: > > Currently, the tokeniser and the lexer are a combined entity. Yes, in the vast majority of languages; so people get used to thinking that it has to be this way. > my preferred solution would be to have the tokenizer, > lexer and parser as a single, hand-crafted LR(k) monstrosity. This is a case of me agreeing with Simon 1000%. I was going to just let it go by, but I thought it might be nice to add my <aol/> for a change. -- John Porter
- Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in Perl (was Re: RF... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in Perl (w... Leon Brocard
- Larry's ALS talk Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Larry's ALS talk Jeff Okamoto
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in Per... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in... Adam Turoff
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely b... Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will lik... Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will lik... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will lik... Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will lik... John Porter
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will lik... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will lik... Ken Fox
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will lik... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will lik... Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will lik... David L. Nicol
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will lik... Ken Fox
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely b... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will lik... Adam Turoff
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will lik... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will lik... Adam Turoff