On 18 Dec 00, at 15:21, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
> There needs to be a hierachy of _repertoires_ such that:
>
> ASCII is subset of Native is subset of wchar_t is subset of UNICODE.
But we can't even rely on that. I can imagine a couple of Native
encodings around that fiddle with ASCII (for example, JIS has a Yen
sign in place of the backslash, I believe). Even if we ignore language-
specific variants of ISO 646; I don't know whether they're still in use
anywhere, but if they are, then { | } [ \ ] ~ are all out, and probably
a couple of others, too (@?).
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: String representation Philip Newton
- Re: String representation Philip Newton
- Re: String representation Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: String representation Nicholas Clark
- Re: String representation Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: String representation Kai Henningsen
- Re: String representation Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: String representation Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: String representation Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: String representation Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: String representation Philip Newton
- Re: String representation Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: String representation David Mitchell
- Re: String representation Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: String representation Nicholas Clark
- Re: String representation David Mitchell
- Re: String representation Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: String representation Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: String representation David Mitchell
- Re: String representation Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: String representation David Mitchell
