Re: Specifying vtable API in terms of macros?

[Dan Sugalski]

At 05:00 PM 2/5/2001 -0200, Branden wrote:
>Garrett Goebel wrote:
> > I thought one of the benefits of vtables was to facilitate extending
>support
> > for new types?
> >
> > Does RFC 32 have any place in this discussion?
>
>Yes!!!

No. It's far too high-level a sort of thing for vtables, which are one step 
above assembly language in the grand scheme of things.

                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk