At 12:51 AM 2/10/2001 -0200, Branden wrote:
>Back to the GC issue, I was wondering something.
Okay, I snipped all of this. After reading it, I'm pretty sure it makes no
sense at all.
Branden, I'd recommend picking up a copy of _Garbage Collection_ and
reading it. The ISBN's in the perl reading list. (My copy's in the office
or I'd dig it out for you)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Branden
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Alan Burlison
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Dan Sugalski
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Sam Tregar
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Buddha M Buck
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Filipe Brandenburger
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Branden
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Jan Dubois
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Branden
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Dan Sugalski
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Branden
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloni... Dan Sugalski
