Hong Zhang > > A deterministic finalization means we shouldn't need to force programmers > > to have good ideas. Make it easy, remember? :) > > I don't believe such an algorithm exists, unless you stick with reference > count. > Either doesn't exist, or is more expensive than refcounting. I guess we have to make a decision between deterministic finalization and not using refcounting as GC, because both together sure don't exist. And don't forget that if we stick with refcounting, we should try to find a way to break circular references, too. - Branden
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Branden
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Simon Cozens
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) abigail
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Damien Neil
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Simon Cozens
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Hong Zhang
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Branden
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Branden
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Tim Bunce
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Damien Neil
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Branden
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Uri Guttman
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Alan Burlison
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Hong Zhang
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Alan Burlison
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Hong Zhang
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski