Re: string encoding

[Simon Cozens]

On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 10:24:51AM -0300, Branden wrote:
> Yes, for UTF-16 it is. For UTF-32 it isn't

Yes, it damned well is.

You're confusing "codepoint" with "number of bytes in representation".

-- 
I would imagine most of the readers of this group would support abortion
as long as fifty or sixty years after conception for certain individuals
    - Michael Stevens