At 01:38 PM 3/2/2001 -0800, Hong Zhang wrote:
> > I was hoping to get us something that was guaranteed to hold an integer,
>no
> > matter what it was, so you could do something like:
> >
> > struct thingie {
> > UV type;
> > INT my_int;
> > }
>
>What is the purpose of doing this?
At this point none, since I've seen the error of my ways and have stricken
that bit from the PDD. :) I was thinking it would be useful for code that
needed to operate on bare perl integers, but that thought wasn't fully
thought out.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Andy Dougherty
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Nicholas Clark
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Uri Guttman
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Paolo Molaro
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types David Mitchell
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Nicholas Clark
