On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 04:10:28PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Yes, I realize that point 5 may result in someone getting a meaningless
> Unicode string. Too bad--it is *not* the place of a programming language to
> enforce validity on data. That's the programmer's job.
But points 4 and 5 do enforce Unicode on everyone. Not that I'm particularly
upset by that idea, but... :)
open FH, $datafile or die $!; undef $/;
$foo = <FH>;
die "Confusing" if -s $datafile != length $foo;
I'm just not sure it's fair on Old World hackers. Will there be a way to stop
Perl upgrading stuff to Unicode on the way in?
--
<pudge> i've dreamed in Perl many time, last night i dreamed in Make,
and that just sucks.
- Re: Unicode handling Bryan C. Warnock
- Re: Unicode handling Hong Zhang
- Re: Unicode handling Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Nicholas Clark
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Larry Wall
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Simon Cozens
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Simon Cozens
- Re: Unicode handling Simon Cozens
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- Re: Unicode handling Dave Mitchell
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- Re: Unicode handling Dave Storrs
- Re: Unicode handling Philip Newton
