At 12:05 PM 4/11/2001 -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: >On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > > No. That's because you won't include perl.h when you embed perl in your > > app--you'll include something like per/embed.h or perlembed.h that has > just > > the definitions for the bits perl exports for embedding. > >Ah, ok. That's a change from perl5 practice, but probably a good >one. It's worth noting explicitly in the appropriate PDD. Good point. Folks are going to assume we're doing things the perl 5 way unless we specify otherwise. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Dave Mitchell
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Andy Dougherty
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Bryan C. Warnock
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Bryan C. Warnock
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Andy Dougherty
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc John Siracusa
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc John Siracusa
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Kai Henningsen
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Hong Zhang
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Dave Storrs
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Brent Dax