On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Brent Dax wrote:
>
> Perhaps I wasn't entirely clear. I'm suggesting array-of-symbol-tables
> instead of array-of-arrays.
It is right now in perl 5, and that isn't changing. How do you think
string eval finds lexicals in scope by name now? :)
Dan
- Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Stephane Payrard
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Simon Cozens
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Sam Tregar
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Sam Tregar
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski
