Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter

[Dan Sugalski]

At 10:32 AM 9/4/2001 +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> > * Methods get their parameters passed in as a list in PMC register 0,
> > * unless we can unambiguously figure out their prototype at
> > * compilation time
>
>Will the subroutine know how it was called? (ie: Through method
>dispatch or through straightforward symbol table lookup. I'm really
>hoping the answer to this is 'yes'.) Or will methods and subroutines
>be distinct now?

I suppose we could, and I don't know.

Can you see any use of a sub knowing it was called via a method call?

                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk