Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter

[Dan Sugalski]

At 03:48 PM 9/4/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
> >>>>> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>   DS> Ah. I've always wanted to do that with tied hashes. Okay, even
>   DS> more reason to pass the data in! (We're going to end up with a
>   DS> WANT register by the time we're done...)
>
>that is not a bad idea. we could allocate a PMC register (e.g. #31)
>permanently to store WANT info (in a hash i assume like the RFC
>implies).

I don't think I'd want to soak up a PMC register that way. Maybe an integer 
one.


                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk