On Sat, 08 Sep 2001 13:02:04 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>>Uri mentioned exp(x) = e^x, but I think if you are going to include
>>log2, log10, log, etc, you should also include ln.
>
>Added.
Er... aren't ln and log synonyms?
--
Bart.
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Dan Sugalski
- RE: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental on... John Siracusa
- RE: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Buddha Buck
- RE: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Wizard
- RE: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Bart Lateur
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Uri Guttman
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Dan Sugalski
- RE: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Wizard
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Brian Wheeler
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Brian Wheeler
- RE: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Dan Sugalski
