Re: Using int32_t instead of IV for code

[Simon Cozens]

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 10:06:51AM +0100, Philip Kendall wrote:
> I think we're also going to need an integer type which is guaranteed to be
> the same width as a pointer, so we can freely typecast between the two.

I thought that was what IVs are *for*.

Simon