On Fri, 2001-09-14 at 10:20, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Okay, we've had a number of people in favor of a good macro assembler for
> Parrot. Given that, do we have anyone who'll volunteer to define, maintain,
> and extend the thing? (Presuming we jump off of the current assembler,
> which seems reasonable)
>
> There probably isn't a huge amount to do with the thing--maintain macro
> substitutions, handle local labels, manage sub definitions, and suchlike
> things.
>
Wouldn't it largely be just filtering the input through cpp?
Brian
> Anyone?
>
> Dan
>
> --------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
> Dan Sugalski even samurai
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
> teddy bears get drunk
