At 06:23 PM 9/19/2001 -0400, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
>All --
>
>I wanted to have a unified op func, name, argc and argtype[] member
>in the interpreter struct, and that led me to make all the changes
>in this patch.
>
>I don't know if I've gone too far, but DO_OP is simpler now, and
>things still seem to run for me.
>
>Anyone else interested in trying this out?
>
>Dan? Does this fly in the face of your overall design, or is this
>a good thing?
Cool, but not a good thing. The problem with it is there's a lot of
extraneous stuff scattered in the function table structure. That's going to
reduce the L1 cache hit rate, and I'd rather not do that.
Separate arrays would be fine, but just not unified like that.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
