On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 04:38 PM 9/20/2001 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 11:39:52AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > > I don't want to do int->pointer casts anywhere in the source if we can
> > > possibly avoid it. Yech.
> >
> >In which case, do we *need* a type that can hold both.
>
> I can't think of a reason, no. I don't promise that a reason doesn't exist,
> however. :)
Well, the following (macro-expanded) line in register.c tries to go both
ways:
chunk_base = (void *)(0xfffff000 & (IV) interpreter->int_reg ) ;
--
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Physics
Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042
