On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
>When tests fail for Really Bad reasons, they tend to do something like this:
>
>Got: '
>'
>Expected: '
>ok 1
>...
>'
>
>It'd be really nice if we could intercept that and give more detail on why
>the test failed. Did the assembler compile to a PBC ok? Did the interpreter
>segfault? (This is what usually happens.) Or did something else happen?
Planning that for post 0.02. do you want that in before?
I can do it sooner.
>Would make debugging a lot quicker.
Regards
Mattia
