At 12:39 AM 9/25/2001 -0400, Steven W McDougall wrote:
>So the declaration of opcode_funcs was at a different level of
>indirection than its allocation and use. The compilers weren't
>complaining about this because of all the (void *) casts. The IRIX64
>compiler did complain, not about indirection levels, but about
>assigning data pointers to function pointers.
Gah, my fault, and thanks for fixing it. I was caught in a maze of twisty
little indirections, and got rather confused. (Hence the casts all over the
place.)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
