On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 12:38:28AM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
> But then I'm one of those weird critters who doesn't understand what all the
> complaining over XS is about. :) I'd be happy to do the XS coding if it came
> down to it.
I'll take a look at making the assembler and disassembler use the
C packfile routines through XS. As I just mentioned in a previous
mail, however, I'm not very happy with the current packfile API...
should I go ahead and use the existing one (temporarily, I hope :>),
or is this section not covered by the current feature freeze?
- Damien
- 0.0.2 needs what? Damien Neil
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Simon Cozens
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Gregor N. Purdy
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Damien Neil
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Simon Cozens
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Dan Sugalski
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Gregor N. Purdy
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Simon Cozens
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Damien Neil
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Dan Sugalski
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Dan Sugalski
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Damien Neil
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Dan Sugalski
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Dan Sugalski
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: 0.0.2 needs what? Dan Sugalski
