> Any and all feedback is appreciated. Personally, (and this isn't directed at you, Tanton) I'd rather see patches that implement or bullet-proof the design and direction of Parrot, rather than dictating them.
Part of any interative programming is figuring out exactly what you need to do, and then doing it. Instead, we're quickly following into the later Perl 5 quagmires, where behavior and features are dictated by whatever happened to be coded. This way lies cruftiness. Just the fact that we needed this patch in the first place indicates that we're not doing *nearly* enough talking beforehand of some of the particulars of Dan's overall design. -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
