At 07:12 PM 10/20/2001 -0400, Sam Tregar wrote:
>On 20 Oct 2001, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
>
> > I want to libify everything to the point where Perl wrappers around
> > the libs allow you to pass the .pasm stuff as a string and get back
> > a packfile that you can pass on to the interpreter, without firing
> > off separate processes and writing files.
>
>Sounds like a good idea. It'll be necessary to have something like this
>to support string eval() anyway, right?
Something like that, yep. (Though string eval won't fire off an assembler)
What'd be really nice, though probably a bad idea for the test suite, was
if the test program could run multiple tests sequentially without having to
exit after each one. Like:
create interpreter
load bytecode for interpreter
execute bytecode in interpreter
destroy interpreter
over and over. Certainly be a good test of the GC system. :)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
