On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Leon Brocard wrote:
> mops.pasm uses a very simple loop to figure out how many operations a
> second parrot can go. However, the loop it uses is inefficient: it
> does a "branch" *and* an "eq" every time around.
> mops.pasm: 11.713909
> ./mops: 108.442655
>
> mops.pasm: 10.647256
> ./mops: 73.574232
>
> Of course, the benchmark could be improved, but I suggest we should at
> least change it to be good, tight code ;-)
Perhaps it's just too late at night, but if this cange makes it better,
tighter code, shouldn't it make the MOPS numbers look better, not worse?
-=- James Mastros
--
Put bin Laden out like a bad cigar: http://www.fieler.com/terror
"You know what happens when you bomb Afghanastan? Thats right, you knock
over the rubble." -=- SLM
