On Monday 08 October 2001 11:43 am, Alex Gough wrote: > On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Bryan C. Warnock wrote: > > Currently, instead of pushing the contents of fixed registers onto the > > stack, the registers themselves float on top of the stack. That doesn't > > preserve register contents on a push_x, as the registers are now in a > > new memory location. After toying with fixed registers per interpreter, > > I decided that it probably wasn't worth it in the long haul. (Since > > it's doubtful, given the size of our register sets, that this would need > > to be done often.) Instead, I'm proposing a parallel set of > > data-preserving push_x ops, save_x. Patch after .sig. > > The following have skipped tests in stacks.t: > > push_n_c > push_i_c > push_s_c
Oh, crap. That's what those are. (rtfm.... rtfm...). Okay, I'll patch the patch. -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
