At 03:59 PM 10/9/2001 -0400, Michael Fischer wrote:
>Declaring that static void * array[] = {...} in a header,
>produced by process_opfunc.pl. Dan, Michael, Bryan,
>care for me to revamp my patch to print out a goto
>table like the above?
Sure, if it works and doesn't get in the way of doing it differently.
>Dan, so out of all this, will vtable funcs have to be
>represented in basic_opcodes.ops, or are they above all
>that, and conversions (if any) done elsewhere?
Vtable code goes elsewhere.
>Or, more
>cogently (*cough*), is the method of writing more stuff
>in basic_opcodes.ops and letting the perl scripts handle
>the conversion to C code still valid regardless of what
>we do with vtables, modules, etc.?
Yup. While the vtable code will be processed differently, it'll still be
processed.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
