Any interest in using something less painful than Make for this? I was thinking of Cons, myself...built in Perl 5 (which we are already requiring you to have), and much more friendly than Make.
Of course, Make has the advantage of being the standard. I won't be at all upset if people don't like the idea--just thought I'd raise the issue. Dave On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote: > Okay, I think it's time to abstract out how the build system's handled a > bit. I'm not sure how much we need, but filling in a template makefile's > not going to cut it, I think.
