At 09:55 PM 12/30/2001 -1000, David & Lisa Jacobs wrote:
>From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > We do still need to address the byte-orientation of the strings. Throwing
>a
> > single null byte on the end's not enough for buffers that have 16 or 32
>bit
> > characters.
>
>Agreed. I'll probably have the encoding structure provide the terminating
>bytes. As a side note don't we also have to split UTF-16 into UTF-16BE and
>UTF-16LE (big endian and little endian)?
I think UTF-16 can be a single encoding. The little/big endian issue can be
dealt with by an I/O filter.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
