At 01:36 PM 12/31/2001 +0000, Simon Cozens wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 12:51:32PM +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > Could I suggest that for gcc we turn on maximal bitchiness, /please/
> > -Wall, -W and everything even bitchier still that we can get away with.
>
>You are, of course, correct. gcc is a lot laxer than many other compilers,
>so we want to get away with as little as possible. -Wall should be default
>for gcc. (And please remember that not every compiler supports -Wall, so
>make it gcc specific!)
I committed a patch yesterday that forces -Wall for gcc builds. If that's
not cranky enough, give me a list of more gcc switches and I'll add 'em
into the list.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
