At 08:46 AM 1/1/2002 -1000, David & Lisa Jacobs wrote:
>Actually, I started down this road as well, but thought it would make more
>sense to make the opcode_t unsigned. This would allow us to keep it a
>consistent size across platforms if we want.
I'd rather opcode_t stays signed--that gives us two magic returns, 0 and
-1, that we can cheaply check for to signal errors or something.
I think a variant on this patch would be in order.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
